Best first lens for a Canon 60D: 50mm prime, 17-50mm f/2.8 zoom, or 60mm macro?
Asked 12/14/2011
3 views
2 answers
0
I’m choosing a first and initially only lens for a Canon 60D (APS-C). My shooting is roughly 50% people indoors, 25% still life/food indoors, and 25% outdoors. I’d like something good quality without spending as much as higher-end standard zooms right away.
I’m considering:
- Canon 50mm f/1.4
- Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 (non-VC)
- Canon 60mm f/2.8 Macro
Longer term, I may eventually add a better standard zoom, so I’m trying to pick the most useful lens to start with. Which of these makes the best single-lens choice on a 60D, and are there better alternatives for this kind of shooting?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
6
You have pretty much done your homework, 50mm f/1.4 and 17-50 f/2.8 makes a good combination for indoor usage, one giving you better range for group shots, and another better portraits with shallow DOF and neither one breaking your bank balance! However, for portraits, instead of the 50mm you could try a 85mm f/1.8 (price range almost same) which is a very good lens for doing portraits as well. As you already have the 50mm f/2.8 range covered with your zoom lens, 85mm f/1.8 makes better sense than 50mm f/1.4. Only problem will be sometimes you wont have enough room to use a lens this long, which could potentially be a problem for the 500mm as well. You can always buy the nifty-fifty (50mm f/1.8, ~100$) if you miss the 50mm f/1.4 setup too much!
Do not underestimate your kit lens. Its very versatile (f.e 18-55 can be used for descent macro works i.e butterflies, flowers etc). I always encourage beginners to get the kit as their first lens instead of buying something expensive because, using the kit helps you understand your shooting preferences, subjects, preferred focal length and thus gives you an idea of what should be your next purchase.
17-85mm does not differ too much from 18-55 in terms of image quality as opposed to 17-55mm IS or 15-85mm IS which are really good lenses.
EDIT: If you're decided on buying one lens, I'd prefer the Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 (currently on rebate in B&H) just because it'll allow you to take group shots as well as decent portraits. You can also consider the 50mm f/1.8, its pretty cheap and has amazing image quality as well as low light capability. You can get both of them in around 500$ now. Even if you upgrade to 15-85mm later and decide on selling off the Tamron 17-50mm, I'm sure you'll be more than willing to keep the 50mm with you.
Originally by user2476. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user2476
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For a single first lens on a Canon 60D, the 17-50mm f/2.8 is the most practical choice. On APS-C, 50mm or 60mm acts more like a short telephoto, which is great for portraits but not very versatile as your only lens. Indoors especially, 50mm can feel too tight for general shooting or group shots.
A 17-50mm f/2.8 gives you useful wide-to-short-tele range plus a constant fast aperture, making it a strong all-around option for indoor people, food, and outdoor use. It also complements future primes well.
If you prefer a prime-only approach, something around 28mm to 35mm is a better “normal” focal length on the 60D than 50mm. A 50mm f/1.4 is better as a portrait/special-purpose lens than as your only lens.
The 60mm macro is also a good niche option if close-up object work is important: it can handle detailed still life and also works for portraits. But as an only lens, it’s even less flexible than 50mm.
So: choose the 17-50mm f/2.8 as the best first/only lens. Add a fast prime later if you want more shallow depth of field or lower-light portrait capability.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Which is sharper: Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC Macro or Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 VC?
Should I buy a Canon 50mm f/1.8 or a Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 as a second lens?
Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 VC vs non-VC: is stabilization worth it, and are they upgrades over an 18-55mm kit lens?
Best all-around standard zoom around $600 for a Canon Rebel T2i?
How much more light does a constant f/2.8 zoom give compared with an 18-55mm kit lens?