Are third-party batteries reliable for the Nikon D7200, or should I stick with Nikon originals?
Asked 3/4/2020
1 views
2 answers
0
I’m using a Nikon D7200 and have had mixed results with battery life. I’ve used original Nikon batteries before, but one seemed to drain unusually quickly. Are third-party replacements a good option for the D7200? I’m interested in general reliability, lifespan, and safety compared with Nikon batteries, and whether brands like Neewer, Vemico, Patona, or RavPower are worth considering.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
6y ago
2 Answers
2
I have no experience with either of those brands, but I do have some experience with third party batteries (for Canon).
In general the ones I have tried are just as good as the original. In the beginning. Over time they tend to lose max capacity faster than original batteries.
Considering that they only cost half-ish of what an original battery costs, this is still okay, as they still have a lifetime that is more than half the lifeime of the original.
But.. I must also add that I once had a third party battery that started making a weird sine-sound that were getting louder and louder while charging. Fearing it might explode, I took it out of the charger, and the sound slowly died away. After that I threw the battery away.
This has happened once in approx. 8 third party batteries and never with an original.
The point is that while third party batteries ARE cheaper and provides an okay alternative, they might not have underwent the same quality control as the originals,
Originally by user88557. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user88557
6y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Nikon’s original batteries are usually the safest choice if you want the most consistent quality and compatibility. Third-party batteries can work perfectly well, and many photographers find them good value, especially since they often cost less.
The main tradeoff is consistency: third-party batteries tend to vary more in quality, and some may lose capacity faster over time than the camera-maker’s batteries. Experiences also differ by brand and even by production batch. While many users have no problems, there are occasional reports of poor performance or charging issues, so quality control may be less predictable.
Based on the shared experiences here, Patona and RavPower have a decent reputation, while opinions on third-party batteries in general are mixed rather than universally positive or negative.
If you want maximum reliability and minimal risk, stick with Nikon batteries. If you’re comfortable experimenting to save money, a reputable third-party battery can be a reasonable backup or spare—just buy from a trusted seller and stop using any battery that behaves oddly while charging or in use.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI6y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Should I update Nikon D5100 firmware if I want to use third-party batteries?
Are third-party LP-E5 batteries safe and reliable for a Canon 450D battery grip?
Are third-party battery grips for a Nikon D5200 reliable enough to use long term?
Why do some third-party lenses have compatibility issues on newer camera bodies?
Which third-party speedlights work well with Canon E-TTL, zoom, and auto modes?