Are there compact cameras that come close to DSLR image quality and speed?
Asked 4/9/2011
6 views
2 answers
0
I’ve been using a Nikon D40 and like the clean images, decent low-light performance, fast autofocus, and minimal shutter lag. What I don’t like is the size, and I don’t need most of the manual or advanced controls.
Is there a smaller camera—ideally closer to a point-and-shoot—that can get reasonably close to DSLR results, especially for low noise, low-light use, and quick response? What types of cameras should I look for?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
13
A few possibilities you might want to consider would be a high-end P&S, a micro 4/3rds, or a Sony NEX.
A higher-end P&S camera (e.g., Canon G-series) gets rid of (most of) the shutter lag common in the cheaper P&S cameras. Image quality can be pretty decent as long as you have lots of light, but like other P&S cameras it deteriorates very quickly in lower light. These also typically cost close to as much as a low-end dSLR that will generally produce considerably higher quality pictures.
A micro-4/3rds is more like an SLR -- they use an electronic viewfinder, but still have interchangeable lenses. They're smaller/lighter than an SLR, but still rather on the largish side for a P&S. The sensor size (and low-light performance) is similar to an SLR.
The Sony NEX are slightly different from micro-4/3rds -- they have a slightly larger sensor, and different lens mount. Otherwise, they have roughly the same tradeoffs; bigger than most P&S, but smaller than an SLR. Image quality is roughly on a par with an SLR -- better than many older SLRs, but not as good as a current higher-end SLR.
None of these addresses focusing speed though. SLRs using phase detection focusing, which is a large part of what lets them focus so fast. P&S cameras use contrast detection focusing which is almost unavoidably slower.
If you want the fast focusing of an SLR, about the only choice is an SLR. For small size/light weight with excellent quality, a Pentax would be a strong possibility.
Originally by user603. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user603
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes, but with tradeoffs. The main reason your D40 performs well is its much larger sensor, which gives lower noise and better low-light results than typical point-and-shoot cameras.
If you want something smaller while staying fairly close to DSLR quality, look at cameras with larger sensors:
- micro four thirds cameras
- Sony NEX-style mirrorless cameras
- large-sensor fixed-lens compacts such as the Fuji X100, Leica X1, or Sigma DP series
A high-end point-and-shoot can reduce shutter lag compared with cheap compacts, but it still usually won’t match DSLR low-light image quality because the sensor is much smaller.
Mirrorless cameras with larger sensors are the best compromise: noticeably smaller than a DSLR, with image quality and low-light performance closer to DSLR territory. The downside is that they’re not truly tiny, and autofocus may still be slower than a DSLR.
If your priorities are low noise, low-light performance, and fast response, sensor size should be your first filter. In practice, a mirrorless camera or a large-sensor compact is the closest match; a conventional pocket point-and-shoot generally won’t fully deliver those DSLR strengths.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What should I look for in a portable, non-professional camera for family photos?
Which compact cameras offer fast burst shooting and low shutter lag?
How do I choose a pocketable compact or mirrorless camera with good image quality on a tight budget?
What small cameras offer advanced controls and zoom without DSLR bulk?
Why do many still cameras have a low base ISO, and when is that actually useful?