Are Nikon Nikkor lenses worth more than Tamron or Sigma lenses?
Asked 10/28/2010
3 views
2 answers
0
How do Nikon Nikkor lenses generally compare with Tamron and Sigma lenses? I’m mainly interested in image quality and value: are Nikkor lenses usually sharper, or are Tamron and Sigma lenses often comparable? If third-party lenses can match Nikon, is one brand generally better, or does it depend on the specific lens?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
15
There are enough variations in lenses that it's hard to make a generalization about an entire brand vs. another. A lot of folks stick to the lenses from their camera manufacturer and I think that in the past the quality tended to be better. That said, some of the third party lens manufacturers have some great lenses, and some of the lenses by Nikon and Canon aren't necessarily the best.
I generally recommend that if you're looking for a particular focal length, aperture, or other feature, compare the various lenses that meet your needs. Based on review sites such as DPReview and Fred Miranda, you can make an educated decision about your particular need.
Originally by user89. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user89
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
There isn’t a reliable brand-wide rule. Lens quality varies a lot by individual model, so you should compare specific lenses with the same focal length, aperture, and features rather than assuming Nikkor is always sharper than Tamron or Sigma.
In general, Nikon makes some excellent lenses, especially at the higher end, but Sigma and Tamron also produce very good lenses—and sometimes offer unique options Nikon doesn’t. All of these brands also have weaker entry-level lenses, so brand alone doesn’t tell you enough.
If your priority is optical performance, read reviews and comparisons for the exact lenses you’re considering. Depending on the model, sometimes the Nikon version is best, and sometimes a Sigma or Tamron is just as good or a better value.
One practical difference noted by users is resale value: first-party lenses often hold value better over time than third-party lenses. So if long-term investment or resale matters, that may favor Nikkor even when image quality is similar.
Recommended products
Core SWX XP-ZOOM-5 5V D-Tap Converter Cable for Zoom H4n (24)
$91.00
View →
Vanguard Multi-Mount 6 Camera Tripod Bar
$74.99
View →
Used Global Dynamics United 24mm f/2.8 Electronic-Only Cine Lens Canon Mount
$285.00
View →
Fotodiox Lens Mount Adapter - Tamron Adaptall (Adaptall-2) To Sony E Mount
$16.00
View →
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Are Sigma lenses a good alternative to Canon lenses on Canon cameras?
How do I tell if a third-party lens will autofocus on a Nikon D5000?
Do Tamron and Sigma EF lenses work with Dual Pixel AF on the Canon 80D?
Are more expensive brand-name lenses always better than third-party alternatives?
Are third-party 70-200mm f/2.8 lenses a good alternative to Canon’s version?