Are cine lenses worth using for still photography?
Asked 2/17/2014
2 views
2 answers
0
Some cine lenses are sold in standard still-camera mounts like Canon EF. They’re much more expensive than typical photography lenses and are optimized for video features such as long focus throw, stepless aperture, controlled breathing, and parfocal zoom behavior. For still photography, do cine lenses offer any meaningful advantages, or are regular photo lenses usually the better choice?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
12y ago
2 Answers
11
There are a few potential advantages, for example:
- The really long focus throw on some cine lenses is very nice for accurate manual focus.
- A stepless aperture enables some extremely specific special effects (e.g. simulated apodization) by way of changing aperture during an exposure.
None of them I would call "significant" when compared to the added weight and bulk of cine lenses which will just slow you down unless working in a studio.
Being parfocal, which you dismiss, is actually of benefit to action/sports photography.
Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1375
12y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Usually, regular photography lenses are the better choice for stills.
Cine lenses can offer a few benefits for still photography: a very long focus throw can make precise manual focusing easier, and a stepless aperture can enable niche creative effects by changing aperture during an exposure. Parfocal behavior can also help in some action or sports situations.
But for most still photographers, those advantages are minor compared with the downsides. Cine lenses are typically larger, heavier, and slower to use, especially outside controlled studio work. More importantly, still-photo lenses often provide features that are much more useful for photography, such as autofocus and image stabilization.
So unless you specifically need precise manual focus handling or another cine-specific behavior, a cine lens is generally not a meaningful upgrade for still photography. It’s usually paying for video-oriented design rather than a major stills advantage.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI12y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why are cinema lenses much more expensive than comparable still-photo lenses?
What is a parfocal lens, and when does it matter in photography?
What camera and lens setup gives the best image quality for macro and product photography?
Good-value Nikon F-mount lenses to try on a Nikon D700
How much do DSLR lens lineups differ between camera brands?