720nm vs 830nm infrared conversion: what practical differences should I expect?
Asked 11/27/2016
4 views
2 answers
0
I'm considering buying a used camera converted for infrared, and I'm trying to choose between a 720nm and 830nm internal long-pass filter. I mainly shoot black and white and care more about tonal separation, dark skies, and deeper shadow contrast than false-color effects. How different are 720nm and 830nm in real use on a digital camera? Will 830nm noticeably improve Wood effect, haze penetration, or darken shadows/skies compared with 720nm, or is the difference fairly small? Also, are hotspot issues lens-dependent regardless of internal vs external filter choice, and do longer wavelengths tend to make hotspots better or worse?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
9y ago
2 Answers
2
I can only offer some decade old empirical observations and mostly coming from comparing results on film:
With longer wavelength, the chances of capturing Wood's effect are better. Longer wavelength also cuts through haze a little bit easier.
Shorter wavelengths seem to be more foolproof (less chance for hot spots), focusing distance difference closer to that of the lens distance scale)...
Originally by user27944. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user27944
9y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
On digital, 720nm and 830nm usually look more similar than many people expect. Both can give dark skies and bright foliage; 830nm tends to push the result a bit further toward pure B&W IR, with slightly stronger Wood effect, a little better haze cutting, and somewhat darker shadows. But the difference is generally modest rather than dramatic.
How much you actually see depends on three things: your sensor’s sensitivity beyond 720nm, whether the lens transmits those wavelengths well, and the scene itself. If the camera sensor has limited response between 720–830nm, the visual difference may be small.
For hotspots, they are mainly lens-related. An internal IR conversion does not guarantee they disappear. Longer wavelengths are often less foolproof, with somewhat greater hotspot risk than shorter IR wavelengths.
So, if you want maximum flexibility, 720nm is usually the safer choice. If you specifically want deeper IR for monochrome and don’t care about color possibilities, 830nm can give slightly stronger IR character—but expect an incremental change, not a radically different look.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI9y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How will Ilford SFX 200 and Rollei Infrared 400 differ when used with a 720nm IR filter?
What should I look for when choosing an infrared lens filter?
Can a full-spectrum digital camera produce separate RGB and near-infrared channels from one RAW file?
Why can some cameras still shoot infrared without removing the internal IR-cut filter?
Why do my 550nm false-color infrared photos turn mostly one color after channel swapping?