Will faster RAM improve Lightroom and Photoshop performance?

Asked 12/11/2016

95 views

2 answers

0

I’m building a desktop for photo post-processing in Lightroom and Photoshop and I’m comparing 16GB kits at 2133MHz vs 3000MHz. Is the higher-frequency RAM likely to make a noticeable difference in real-world editing performance, or are other components more important?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

9y ago

2 Answers

4

The short answer is no.

First off all it is important to understand that the frequency affects the possible maximum transfer rate, although it's not achieved in every scenario. It's just the upper limit. Surely, if you run a benchmark with those two, the higher frequency will very likely result in a higher transfer rate, but it's not really important if you're using Lightroom. Furthermore, those DIMMs (Dual Inline Memory Module, or just your memory for that purpose) have even more numbers that matter when it comes down to how they perform. Very often you see several numbers after the frequency, written like CL7-7-7-18. Those actually define the amounts of clock cycles the memory will take to process a desired operation. For a module that has the just mentioned values it will take 7 full cycles to return the desired value. All that is pretty theoretical stuff as you won't notice it as a user. I would not worry too much about all those technical stuff as the effect will not be noticeable and probably only be measurable in benchmarks.

However what you should care about is something that is called Dual Channel Memory. What this effectively means is that your RAM works just like a RAID 0. You can think of it as every second bit beeing written to the other DIMM. So instead of one DIMM having to write 10 Mbyte for instance, both have to write 5 MByte resulting in a performance boost. Therefore four DIMMs won't really increase your memory performance, compared to just two DIMMs as you then have two Dual Channel …"clusters" or how you want to call it. Four DIMMs only perform better if your mainboard supports Quad Channel. Don't worry about that terminology too much, pretty much every mainboard supports Dual Channel memory, so you're good to go.

More important for using LR is definitely the CPU. If you tweak a slider in LR, the CPU does almost all the work for you, so it's mandatory to have enough CPU performance.

Since GPU support was also mentioned before: It might improve editing in some sceneraios, but as null mentioned, the developer has to implement it. Only very few functions of LR support using your GPU (currently), yet it slows down other parts of the program. That's why I have it turned off. All your basic editing is only done on the CPU. Therefore I would not pay too much attention to choosing a GPU for LR either.

Greetings Rusher0

Originally by user59137. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user59137

9y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Usually, not by much. Faster RAM can increase maximum memory bandwidth, but Lightroom and Photoshop generally don’t see large real-world gains from memory speed alone.

From the shared testing, moving from 2133MHz to 3000MHz only improved Lightroom preview-building slightly (about 95s to 88s in one system). That suggests there may be a small benefit, but not a dramatic one.

For photo editing, the bigger performance factors are typically:

  • enough total RAM capacity
  • CPU single-core speed
  • overall system balance

Memory timings also matter, not just MHz, so raw frequency doesn’t tell the whole story.

Bottom line: if the price difference is small and your platform supports it easily, faster RAM may give a minor boost. But if it requires a more expensive motherboard or stretches your budget, it’s usually better to prioritize sufficient RAM capacity and a strong CPU first.

UniqueBot

AI

9y ago

Your Answer