Why does the background look brighter after changing lenses at the same f/2.8 in studio?
Asked 4/15/2018
80 views
2 answers
0
In a studio setup, I shot a portrait tethered to a laptop with a 24-70mm lens at f/2.8, then switched to an 85mm lens and kept the same camera and light settings. On the laptop, the background appeared brighter even though I didn’t intentionally change the exposure. Does changing focal length affect exposure on a digital camera, similar to bellows extension in large format, or is something else causing this?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
2
First - When doing large format photography does the length of the bellows effect exposure?
When imaging we focus by moving the lens away from or towards the film or digital sensor. When imaging distant subjects the lens to image plane is most short, when imaging close, the lens to image plane is elongated. Any elongation of this lens to image distance causes the f-numbers to become invalid. If significant, under-exposure will be the result. For subject distances greater than 1 meter (1 yard) this phenomenon called “bellows factor” is infinitesimal. As we focus closer and closer “bellows factor” becomes significant. When we get close enough to achieve “unity” (life-size or 1:1), the f-numbers are 2 f-stops off. Thus “bellows factor” becomes significant at about 2 feet (600mm) and under exposure is likely. That is why the macro lens is popular, its design mitigates “bellows factor”. Additionally, modern cameras read exposure through the lens. Thus the exposure will be predicated on the camera’s ability to reverse the effect of “bellows factor”. We are talking the same danger, digital vs. film, large format vs. miniature camera.
I switched to 85mm lens and didn't change anything and made sure I am still at f/2.8 and shot the same thing. But on laptop screen I noticed the light on the background seemed to be increased!
The beauty of the f-number system is they take into account the focal length of the lens and the working diameter of lens (aperture). Thus the f-number system is universal, f/2.8 delivers same exposure regardless of focal length or working diameter. So why did you see the background change? Likely when you switched to the 85mm you repositioned yourself, i.e. you changed subject distance. That could account for this change especially if you were using a flash. Now different lenses will pass more or less light based on the number and coloration of the glass elements that comprise the lens. Most likely the lens switch changed the angle of view, you moved and recomposed. These interactions changed the way the background looked.
Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user44949
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Changing from a 24-70mm to an 85mm lens at the same indicated f/2.8 usually does not meaningfully change studio exposure by itself, assuming subject and lights stay in the same places. Bellows-factor-style exposure loss is only significant at close focus; at normal portrait distances it is negligible.
What can change is:
- Lens transmission: Two lenses set to the same f-number can transmit slightly different amounts of light because f-stop is geometric, while real transmission is measured as T-stop. The difference is usually small.
- Framing/background rendering: A longer lens shows a narrower angle of view. If your background lighting is uneven, the 85mm may crop into a brighter portion of the backdrop, making it appear brighter on screen even though exposure on the subject hasn’t changed.
So the most likely explanation is not focal length changing exposure, but either slight lens transmission differences or, more likely, different background area/lighting being included in the frame.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why did depth of field seem shallower after switching to manual focus on my Canon RP?
Does unit focusing change depth of field compared with internal/element focusing?
Why can flash exposures differ slightly between P, A and S modes even with the same settings?
Why do my Fujifilm X-T20 photos look darker than my Canon 400D at the same settings?
Why does exposure change when zooming video in Manual mode with a Nikon D7500 and 16-85mm lens?