Why does a Nikon D3s IR-converted body record a bright frame with the body cap on?
Asked 2/8/2016
28 views
2 answers
0
My Nikon D3s has been converted for infrared photography, so the camera’s original IR-cut filter has been removed. If I shoot a dark frame at very high ISO with no lens attached, the body cap on, and the camera covered so no outside light can enter, the image is still unexpectedly bright instead of black.
Is this caused by heat or internal infrared radiation inside the camera? Is there anything I can do to reduce or prevent it?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
5
It seems that with the Nikon D3 series (D3, D3x, D3s), the D4 series, the new D5, the Df, the D700, and the D7000 a small infrared emitting diode is used inside the light box while the shutter is open as part of an infrared self-diagnostic shutter monitor circuitry used to confirm shutter timing and function.
When the standard IR filter is on the front of the sensor stack as is the case for all models when they leave the Nikon factory the IR light emitted by the diode is prevented from reaching and being recorded by the imaging sensor.
But when the IR cut filter is replaced with a piece of clear glass to enable infrared photography the IR light emitted by the shutter control system is detected by the sensor and at higher than base ISO and longer exposures it is potentially enough to make the image unusable.
With the camera models listed above that have undergone an IR conversion, staying at base ISO and limiting the length of exposures is necessary to avoid the light emitted by the diode in the infrared self-diagnostic shutter monitor system from unduly affecting the image.
Edit: the following was basically grasping at straws in the dark prior to the discovery of the above information.
Most of what the camera is picking up might be the heat of the body cap itself. Try placing the lens cap in a freezer for several hours, then placing it on the lens and taking a shot. How much darker is the image?
Also, are you blocking stray light from entering via the viewfinder? Even with the mirror in the up position sometimes light can leak around the edges of the mirror. The light entering via the lens during a typical exposure will overpower any such stray light under normal circumstances. But with this experiment you're also capturing near-infrared and there's no visible light coming through the lens to compete.
Also keep in mind that with infrared, visible light that makes it into the mirror box via the viewfinder or an uncapped mounting flange prior to when the shot is taken will create a miniscule amount of heat in the surfaces it falls upon that may affect an exposure made at high ISO and no visible light striking the sensor. Even if the viewfinder and mounting flange are blocked during the exposure, it will take a little while for the small differences in heat to dissipate and for thermal equilibrium to occur within the mirror box.
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
10y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes. On the Nikon D3s and some related Nikon bodies, there is an internal infrared-emitting diode used by the shutter monitoring/diagnostic system while the shutter is open. In a standard camera, the factory IR-cut filter blocks that IR light from reaching the sensor. After an IR conversion, that protection is gone, so the sensor can record the camera’s own internal IR emission.
So this is not mainly heat glow in the usual sense—it’s a known effect from the camera’s internal shutter-monitor IR source becoming visible to the sensor after conversion.
What you can do is limited. Since the source is inside the camera, covering the body or using a cap will not stop it. The practical options are to avoid conditions where it becomes obvious, such as very high ISO and longer exposures, or consult the conversion company/manufacturer about whether shielding or a different conversion approach is possible. But in general, this behavior is a known side effect of IR conversion on these Nikon models.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can a modified DSLR measure object temperature from near-infrared RGB values?
Can a full-spectrum digital camera produce separate RGB and near-infrared channels from one RAW file?
Why can some cameras still shoot infrared without removing the internal IR-cut filter?
How does infrared sensitivity affect tonality in monochrome cameras?
Do point-and-shoot cameras use a separate metering sensor, and how does IR conversion affect focus?