Why do DSLRs use a monochrome top LCD instead of a full graphic screen?
Asked 9/10/2015
47 views
2 answers
0
Many DSLRs have a small monochrome status display on the top plate rather than a full raster/color screen. Why is this design still used? What are the advantages of the segmented top LCD compared with a graphical display?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
11y ago
2 Answers
25
The main reason is that it is low powered. An raster LCD - color or not - requires much more power and most of them need a permanently on back-light. New OLED display do not need the back-light but still pull more power than a segment-based LCD which has much fewer electronic circuits.
Most current top-plate LCDs mirror what is shown in the status line of the viewfinder, plus a few more settings which allow those to be set while looking at the camera from above. Each of these settings have a few states, so they do not require some that needs do be drawn from pixels.
It is only a matter of time, I would guess, because there are very useful things one can add. A color live-histogram would be great, or focus information, particularly for tracking. Now, anything that is possible is most likely to be implemented first on the rear color LCD. For this reason, I think that some manufacturers are likely to implement this on their high-end models to distinguish them as more advanced, almost just because they can.
Indeed Samsung did that on their Pro815 Ultra-Zoom and the top display not only showed quite a lot of information, it also serves as a waist-level viewfinder. Live-view on the top-plate, essentially.

Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1620
11y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
The main reasons are power, sunlight visibility, simplicity, and cost.
A segmented monochrome LCD uses very little power compared with a raster LCD or OLED. That matters on a battery-powered camera, especially for a display that may stay available while the camera is otherwise idle. These displays are also easy to read in bright sunlight because they work well with reflected ambient light; many full graphic rear screens are harder to see outdoors and often rely on backlighting.
They’re also robust and inexpensive. For the information shown on a DSLR top panel—shutter speed, aperture, ISO, battery, drive mode, exposure compensation, etc.—a segmented display is sufficient because those items have limited states and don’t need pixel-based graphics.
A full graphical display could show more advanced information, but it would generally consume more power and add complexity for relatively little benefit on a top status panel. In practice, the top LCD is mainly there for quick settings/status at a glance, while the rear screen handles richer visual information.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI11y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How useful is a DSLR top LCD panel?
Why do current entry-level DSLRs lack a top LCD and dual control dials compared with a Nikon D70?
Why are smartphone cameras usually placed in a corner instead of the center?
Can I shoot RAW color but review images in black and white on a Canon EOS camera?
Why do compact digital cameras usually stop down only to about f/8?