What’s the difference between the Lensbaby Spark and Lensbaby Muse?

Asked 11/29/2012

123 views

2 answers

0

I’m comparing the Lensbaby Spark and Lensbaby Muse as an entry into Lensbaby lenses. The Spark is newer, cheaper, and has more reviews online, while the Muse costs more. From the specs alone, it’s hard to tell what practical differences there are. What features or capabilities differ between them, and which gives better value if I want to start shooting with the Lensbaby system?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

5

The Lensbaby Spark is the lowest priced way to get into a Lensbaby piece of equipment. Right now the MSRP is $80 USD. The LensBaby Muse on the other hand is around $150USD. You would think for those savings you would be missing something, and you are right. The Muse comes with the Lensbaby Double Glass Optic, the Spark does not. Believe it or not, the Lensbaby Double Glass Optic costs $80USD on it's own, so it is pretty much a wash if you are going to buy the Spark to later upgrade and buy the Double Glass Optic.

What this really means is that with the Spark you are limited to a single aperture of f/5.6. On the Muse for example they note aperture values of f/2, f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6, f/8. Something doesn't quite add up for me, as the Double Glass Optic that comes with the Muse notes fewer apertures then the stand alone Double Glass Optic, so potentially they include fewer of the magnetic discs(control aperture) with the Muse then if you buy the optic alone.

What else is different besides the optic and aperture control? The Muse is has many more mount options, so if you aren't Canon or Nikon mount, the Muse might be your only option. Ascetically they are a bit different, the Spark has a huge ring with see through lettering - not my favorite. The Lensbaby lenses aren't really meant to look professional either though, you are going to be fidgeting with them and look kind of ridiculous no matter what - unless you have the Sweet optic 35 I guess.

Anther potential difference is how sharp these get. The Spark will do a good job of selectively focusing an area, or blurring out the outer edges of the image - but I do not believe it will get anything in very sharp focus. The Double Glass Optic can get things in good sharp focus, but I am guessing the Spark is more like the Single Glass Optic which really isn't sharp or great contrast on anything.

If you want to know bang for your buck, I'd get the Spark. It's half of the price and will do selective focus well. It is fun and might bring out your creativity. If you want sharp optics in a similar range that has a variable aperture, I would get a 50mm f/1.8 lens - that is a great bang for your buck in a similar focal length but with great sharp optics when considering the price.

Originally by user4892. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user4892

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

The main difference is that the Spark is the budget entry point, while the Muse is more flexible out of the box. According to the community answers, the Muse includes the Double Glass Optic, while the Spark does not. That matters because the included optic gives the Muse access to interchangeable aperture settings, whereas the Spark is limited to a fixed f/5.6 setup.

So in practical terms:

  • Spark: cheaper, simpler, fixed at f/5.6
  • Muse: more expensive, but includes the optic needed for more aperture choices

If you just want the least expensive way to try the Lensbaby look, the Spark makes sense. But if you think you’ll want more control and may later buy the Double Glass Optic anyway, the Muse is likely the better value, since buying the Spark and then upgrading can erase most of the initial savings.

In short: choose Spark for the cheapest entry; choose Muse for better flexibility and likely better long-term value.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer