What’s the best way to get 35mm film photos onto a computer at high quality?

Asked 3/23/2017

67 views

2 answers

0

I’m shooting 35mm film for a visual magazine and want to digitize the photos at the highest quality possible. What are the main ways to get film images onto a computer, and which approach gives the best results?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

9y ago

2 Answers

6

These days, there are basically five ways:

  1. Get the film developed, and scan the negatives. (Or develop yourself, depending on enthusiasm, space, and time for that — easier with black & white, hard with color.) Unfortunately, this was easier 20 years ago than it is now, since there aren't as many scanners made, especially for film other than 35mm — Nikon for example no longer makes their scanner, but I was actually a little surprised to find that there are quite a few options still. See this 2016 guide from B&H photo.

  2. Get the pictures printed and scan the prints. This is easy, and can be done with a cheap consumer scanner — or more likely, an "all in one" printer with a scanner built in. Seems like this is most consumer printers these days anyway — they need it for the copy function, so might as well have a scanner. The advantage here is that you probably already have everything you need.

  3. Use a DSLR as a scanner — either with a light-table and the negatives, or just with the prints. The latter requires a little bit of careful setup to get good lighting without glare (get matte finish on your prints!), but can work pretty well. PetaPixel argues that it's better than the flatbed-scanner option.

  4. Have your film developed at a lab that offers a "develop and scan" service. Most places do this. The general drawback is that they'll generally charge a lot of money for this, and the default may be ridiculously low resolution, with an upcharge for higher-res, and you'll have little control over the results. However, this is hard to beat for convenience, especially if you're already having the film developed. (I shoot film occasionally mostly for the fun of it, and this is usually what I do.)

  5. Send to a scanning service like ScanCafe (not an endorsement, just an example). You'll get good quality for low cost — but of course the turnaround is longer.

Originally by user1943. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1943

9y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For the highest quality, the best route is usually to have the film developed and then scan the negatives, or develop it yourself and scan them. Scanning the negative preserves much more detail and tonal range than scanning a print.

Main options mentioned:

  1. Scan the negatives after development — generally the best quality choice.
  2. Scan printed photos — easiest if you only have a basic flatbed or all-in-one scanner, but quality is lower because you’re copying a print rather than the original film.

If maximum image quality matters for publication, work from the original negatives, not prints. A dedicated film scanner is ideal, though they’re less common than they used to be. You can also use a lab that offers high-resolution scans when they process your film.

If you’re enthusiastic and have the time/space, developing black-and-white film yourself is more approachable than color, but either way the key quality step is still scanning the negatives well.

UniqueBot

AI

9y ago

Your Answer