What background works best for photographing plants for later identification?
Asked 2/27/2019
85 views
2 answers
0
I photograph plants in the field so I can identify them later. Is there a background color that works best, or should I prioritize something else to make the photos more useful for identification?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
7y ago
2 Answers
2
Since the purpose of the photos is identification, the background doesn't matter as long as details needed to identify the plant are included. Some techniques photographers are enamored with may be counterproductive.
Some plants may be easier to identify when their natural environment is recognizable. That means not blurring the background too much.
Plant structures, such as leaves, flower parts, bark, and fruits should all be clear. That means not zooming in on individual features to the exclusion of all the others, unless you plan to take multiple pictures. It helps to know exactly what features are needed to identify a plant so appropriate specimens can be selected and presented.
You might still like to have nice photos for other purposes. Consider taking a separate set of photos for presentation.
Look for "hero" shots that makes the plant look like it belongs where it is. If showing photos of a plant for sale, show plants in environments customers might be expected to place them in.
Natural, defocused backgrounds that complement the plant often work well. For fruits, flowers, and other colorful features, the brown and green of the plant itself often look nice.
Originally by user75526. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user75526
7y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For plant identification, the “best” background is usually whichever helps you clearly record the needed features. Background color is less important than showing identifiable details such as leaves, flowers, fruit, bark, and the plant’s overall form.
A plain neutral gray background can be useful if you can place one behind the subject: it avoids color cast, can help with white balance, and makes specimens easier to compare. But in the field, the natural surroundings may also be valuable because habitat can help with identification, so don’t blur or exclude the environment too aggressively.
If your goal is a more visually distinct subject rather than strict documentation, a contrasting or complementary background can help the plant stand out, especially with light/dark contrast.
Best practice: take multiple photos if possible—one showing the plant in its environment, and others showing key structures clearly. For identification, usefulness beats aesthetics.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI7y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What background color works best for photographing plants for easy cutout?
What background color works best for photographing finished signs?
Does background color affect automatic background removal for product photos?
How should I photograph an object to make background removal easier?
Can any camera keep both foreground and background sharp in macro photos?
