What are the advantages and disadvantages of glossy monitors for photo editing?

Asked 10/7/2011

106 views

2 answers

0

I'm trying to understand whether glossy displays offer any real benefit for photography work. Do glossy screens improve perceived contrast, saturation, sharpness, or color fidelity compared with matte/anti-glare displays? Also, can adding an anti-glare film reduce image quality or affect the way colors appear?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

6

Apple is not the only manufacturer who provides the option of glossy monitors. Because you see rows of iMacs in the Apple store with glossy monitors does not mean Apple is the only manufacturer who provides them. Also, not all Apple monitors are glossy.

Pros for Glossy Monitors

  • Higher perceived contrast and saturation. This is a two-edged sword. The increase in contrast is wonderful when working on images and just working with applications; however, people viewing your image may have anti-glare displays and they will not see the same saturation and contrast you do.
  • Increased perceived sharpness. Again, wonderful when you are working on your images and with your applications, but be aware that anyone using an anti-glare monitor may not see things as razor-sharp as you do.

Cons Against Glossy Monitors

  • The obvious problem with glossy monitors is that they reflect whatever objects are in the room. The greater the ambient light, the worse this problem can be.
  • As stated above, people with anti-glare displays may not perceive your images as you do.
  • Fingerprinting. Any smudges and fingerprinting (and sneezing and cat paw marks) are very obvious on a glossy screen, whereas you can get away with it longer on an anti-glare surface.

Personal Notes

I prefer a glossy monitor for my main working display. I have an anti-glare as my secondary monitor, so I do have a chance to preview the images somewhat as others will see them. These are both Apple displays. Both are color calibrated and I have not been disappointed with either. On my laptops, I have been far more pleased with the glossy display than the anti-glare, primarily because when I show images to others on the laptop, they display to better effect. Many prefer an anti-glare display on a laptop because you cannot control the lighting around where you use one, but I've been pleased with the added perceived brightness and besides, I don't do any final post processing on a laptop.

Originally by user5270. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user5270

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Glossy monitors are not unique to Apple, and not all Apple displays are glossy.

For photo work, the main advantage of a glossy screen is usually perceptual: images often look higher in contrast, more saturated, and a bit sharper. That can make photos and interface elements look vivid and crisp while editing.

The downside is that this is a viewing characteristic, not necessarily better color accuracy. If you edit on a glossy display, your images may appear punchier than they do on many matte/anti-glare screens, so other viewers may not see the same contrast, saturation, or apparent sharpness.

An anti-glare layer or film can reduce those glossy-screen characteristics. In practice, that can make the image look a little less crisp or less punchy because it diffuses reflections and changes the surface appearance. So yes, it can affect perceived image quality and color appearance, even if the panel itself has not changed.

In short: glossy can look more vivid, but that does not automatically mean better color fidelity.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer