Should I choose screw-in or square ND filters for landscape photography?
Asked 4/14/2016
52 views
2 answers
0
I’m starting out with landscape photography and want to buy ND filters on about a £100 budget. I’m confused about whether screw-in filters or a square filter holder system would be the better choice. I’ve heard square systems can be more versatile and may help avoid vignetting, but I’ve also seen mixed opinions about some brands because of colour casts. For landscapes, what type of ND filter setup makes the most sense for a beginner, and should I also consider a circular polariser?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
2
I enjoy DIY projects.
A good quality square filter holder can be used with your home-grown versions as well as both round and square store-bought filters. You can use gelatin, glass, or plastic. That way you can also buy filters intended for other equipment so long as they are larger in diameter than your lens. You don't even have to cover the whole lens for some effects that begin or end at the horizon or other straight-line in your shot.
Try building a tiny glass "tank" to fit inside the filter holder that you can fill with food dyes mixed with water (or alcohol on winter days). The dyes can be dropped into the tank and used before and after becoming evenly mixed for a myriad of unique effects.
A small removable liquid filter tank is made with two squares of glass sealed with silicone sealer and thickness spacer of plastic tubing in the shape of a "U." Leave the top of the tank open to fill with an eye-dropper and empty by removing the tank and spilling out the liquid.
Hand-held shots can be ruled-out and a good tripod is necessary for this technique; but, you should be using one with a shutter release for good landscapes anyway.
The formula for re-creating certain hues is counting 1 drop = 1/20 millilitre. When you know the volume of the tank, you can recreate your favourite colours to-go. Keep notes
Is this a hassle? YES
Is this fun? YES
Will you regret this? NEVER
Originally by user21789. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user21789
10y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For landscape work, both can work, but they suit different needs.
Square filters are generally more versatile: one holder can take different filters, they offer lots of variety, and they’re especially useful for graduated effects where you may not need to cover the whole lens evenly. A good holder can also reduce limitations compared with buying separate screw-in filters for every lens size.
Screw-in filters are simpler and often a good starting point if you’re new to ND filters and on a budget. Inexpensive ND sets can still give very good results and are handy to keep in your bag.
In terms of use, a neutral density filter reduces light evenly so you can use longer shutter speeds—classic for blurring waterfalls or other moving water in landscapes. A circular polariser is also very useful for landscapes because it helps cut reflections from water, glass, and other shiny surfaces.
If you’re just starting out, a practical approach is to begin with a basic screw-in ND and a circular polariser. If you later want more flexibility, especially for graduated effects, move to a square holder system.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can I use different brands of square ND filters in the same holder?
Can you stack a circular ND behind a square graduated ND filter holder?
How can I use a polarizer and ND filters together without buying a full set for every lens?
Can you use a screw-on variable ND filter with a Cokin Z square filter holder?
Can I use a screw-in variable ND together with graduated ND filters in a holder?