Is emitted light fundamentally different from reflected light in photography?
Asked 2/11/2013
96 views
2 answers
0
For practical photography, is there any general difference between emitted light and reflected light beyond brightness? I’m not asking about one specific source bouncing off one specific material, but about the overall concepts: do emitted and reflected light have different qualities photographers should think about?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
10
With emitted light you work in the additive colour domain, and reflected light is subtractive colours. See the differences in RGB (screens) and CMYK (printers), e.g. to see yellow you can emit R+G, or subtract B.
Emitting a colour is easier to control than subtracting, because reflected light depends on the product of the (emitting) light source and the material BRDF.
The strength is controllable in both cases, so you can't see that emitted light is stronger. The perceived strength is a function of the wattage you burn off from the light source, distance and spread, and the integral in your viewer sensitivity spectrum of the light spectrum. This is why LED light seems stronger for the same amount of wattage as a halogen light. The halogen does emit more light, but a lot of it is outside the visible spectrum, and is thus not integrated.
If your reflective surface is very diffuse, you get more spread , and are less likely to see a imprint of the light source. this is the reason diffuse lighting is easier to achieve by emitting light into a dome with a white diffuse coating. Perfect white is hard to achieve so this does have some loss, and the distance form the emitting light to the subject will get longer, too. so to get the same strength as you'd get with emitting light directly, you increase the power. You can also reflect the light on a mirror surface and achieve a longer distance, without polarisation or diffusing it. This is often used to increase the FOV of the light source and the physical dimension does not allow it.
Polarisation you can control in both cases. You can get a polariser sheet to place in front of your light. Or you can carefully choose your reflective surface to give the polarisation you want.
Originally by user11455. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user11455
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Not fundamentally: light is still light whether it comes directly from a source or reaches you after reflection. The practical differences come from how it is produced and modified.
Directly emitted light is often easier to control because the source defines its color and intensity. Reflected light depends on both the original light source and the reflecting material, which can change color, intensity, direction, and spread.
A key photographic difference is that emitted light is often a small or point-like source, while reflected light from a matte surface becomes more diffuse and spread out. That usually means softer shadows, gentler glare, and less harsh contrast—similar to the difference between direct sun and overcast light.
Color can also be thought of differently: emitted light is typically discussed in additive terms (like RGB screens), while reflected color is subtractive in effect because the surface absorbs some wavelengths and reflects others.
Some reflections can also polarize light, especially from glass or water, but that is specific to certain reflective surfaces, not all reflected light.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why doesn’t bounced light fully illuminate a cast shadow after multiple reflections?
What is the composition term for placing the subject off-center?
How much does camera body choice really matter, and when does a more expensive camera make a difference?
Is visual beauty essential in landscape photography?
What’s the difference between exposure compensation and Picture Control brightness in-camera?