Is DjVu a good format for storing and organizing photo collections?

Asked 7/22/2012

16 views

2 answers

0

I need to organize many photos into albums or packages. I’ve been putting them into ZIP/CBZ files, but I’m wondering if DjVu would be a better format for storing sets of photographs. Is DjVu suitable for photo collections, or is there a better way to organize and archive them?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

3

That seems terrible to me. Djvu is a format designed for scanned documents, not for photographs. It has features that are great for that — like separation of text from the background — but which are useless for photographs. And it doesn't have any particular features which make it good for photography. It uses a wavelet compression algorithm, which is generally good and probably better than that used for JPEG, but if your photos are already JPEGs then you're just introducing double compression artifacts. The only reason to do this would be if space is at a premium over quality.

I think your reasonable options are:

  1. Store in a filesystem with subdirectories.
  2. Use a program with photograph cataloging features, like Adobe Lightroom.
  3. Use a sophisticated digital content management system like Dspace.

You could use archive files like zip, but I don't see any particular advantage in doing so unless you need to give them to other people on a regular basis.

Originally by user1943. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1943

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

DjVu is generally not a good choice for photo collections. It was designed mainly for scanned documents, not photographs, so its strengths don’t really help with image sets.

If your photos are already JPEGs, converting them into DjVu can add another round of compression and may reduce quality without giving meaningful benefits. It’s only worth considering if saving space matters more than image quality.

Better options mentioned in the answers are:

  • keep photos in normal folders/subfolders on your filesystem
  • use photo cataloging software such as Lightroom
  • use a digital asset/content management system for larger archives
  • use CBZ/CBR if you simply want multiple images in one file for easy viewing/reference, since they’re basically ZIP/RAR containers
  • use PDF for presentation or sharing when layout, printing, or distribution controls matter

For long-term organization and archival, cataloging software or a well-structured folder system is usually more useful than packing photos into DjVu files.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer