Is adapting old SLR lenses to a mirrorless camera practical and worthwhile?
Asked 6/6/2012
76 views
2 answers
0
I have several old Konica SLR lenses and am considering a mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera, such as Sony NEX or Micro Four Thirds, so I can keep using them with an adapter. Is this a practical setup for regular photography?
I know I would lose autofocus, and I assume aperture control would usually be manual as well. Does manual focusing become difficult on these cameras, or does live view/magnification make it manageable? Would I also lose automatic exposure modes and EXIF data?
More generally, is there any real image-quality or optical advantage to using older manual-focus lenses on modern mirrorless bodies, or is this mainly worthwhile only if I already own the lenses and enjoy the manual process?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
8
Breaking down your question:
Is it worth the effort?
If you already own lenses and don't want to spend money on digital lenses, you could say it is worth it. If you don't want to fiddle with the manual focus, it's not worth it. If you have to use this in an environment where fast focusing is critical, then no, it's not worth it. This is a bit subjective.
Does focusing become difficult?
I use a Canon 550D with a Pentacon 50mm f1.8 lens. Focusing through the viewfinder is hard. With a micro 4/3 you don't have an optical viewfinder so you don't have that problem.
When using liveview, focusing is not hard at all. Just enlarge the image several times on the LCD screen and get the focus right. My Pentacon lens does have a tight focus ring, which takes more effort to turn compared to a digital lens focus ring.
Should I use manual mode?
You could use manual (M) mode or Aperture priority (Av) mode. In both modes it is important that your lens diaphragm switch is set to manual. By this you ensure that when you turn the aperture ring, the aperture blades actually move. In auto mode the aperture will remain wide open to allow a bright viewfinder image, only when the shutter is clicked it will change its aperture to the desired value. The mechanism to provide this functionality is not present on modern cameras, therefore set the switch to manual.
In the first mode you would set the aperture on your lens and set the shutter time in camera manually. In the Av mode the camera calculates the appropriate shutter speed based on the exposure it measures. You might have to adjust the exposure by under or overexposing a bit. This depends on your lens. When I use my Canon/Pentacon setup I have to underexpose with one stop to get a correctly exposed image.
Will it be practical?
When you have the time and patience to manually focus and to set your exposure settings, it will be practical. Keep in mind though that old lenses don't have Image Stabilization, so camera shake might become a problem at low shutter speeds.
When you need to focus quickly, or when you're not able to see the LCD screen when taking the shot, it's not really practical.
What is the optical advantage?
This depends on the lenses you have.
Originally by user9161. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user9161
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes, it can be practical on mirrorless cameras, but mainly if you already own the lenses and are happy shooting manually.
Mirrorless bodies are better for adapted lenses than DSLRs because live view and focus magnification make manual focus much easier than using a standard optical viewfinder. It’s still slower than native autofocus, so it’s a poor choice for action or any situation where fast focusing matters.
You should expect to lose AF and usually lose camera-controlled aperture. In practice, you’ll often shoot in manual focus and use manual exposure or aperture-priority, depending on the camera and adapter. You may also lose EXIF details such as lens, focal length, and aperture.
There are downsides beyond convenience: older full-frame film lenses often become less useful on APS-C or Micro Four Thirds because the crop factor makes wide-angle lenses behave more like normal lenses.
So: if your goal is maximum ease of use and the best all-around modern experience, native lenses are better. If you already have good old lenses and enjoy a slower, hands-on style, adapting them to mirrorless can be very worthwhile and fun. The value is usually in reuse and character, not in clear optical superiority over modern lenses.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Does a Sony NEX crop sensor change the focal length of M42 or M39 lenses?
Are Konica FS-1 lenses compatible with Minolta film SLR bodies?
Can Canon EF lenses be adapted to a Pentax 645N, and will they cover the full 645 frame?
Can a 35mm film SLR be converted to digital?
How does AF-confirm work with a manual lens adapter on a Canon DSLR?