Is a used Canon EOS-1D Mark II a worthwhile upgrade from a Canon 450D?
Asked 8/25/2010
3 views
2 answers
0
I currently use a Canon 450D and have found a secondhand Canon EOS-1D Mark II for about £500 at a local camera shop. Would this be a worthwhile upgrade, or would I be better off saving for something newer like a 5D or 7D? I'm mainly trying to understand whether the 1D Mark II is enough of a real improvement over the 450D to justify buying an older pro body.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
16y ago
2 Answers
6
For that price, I would grab a 1DMkII. That sounds like a pretty good bargain. Its about the same price as my 450D when I purchased it new (well, perhapse a couple hundred more), and even though the 450D has a larger MP count, the 1D still has several advantages:
- Larger sensor (1.3x crop vs. 1.6x crop), so wider FOV
- It'll make better use of EF lenses, however it will not be compatible with any EF-S lens
- Better ISO capabilities
- Overall ISO quality is likely not that much better
- You have extended range (50 through 3200)
- You can adjust ISO in 1/3rd stops vs. 1 stops
- Much finger grained control over most settings
- White Balance/Tint
- Far more custom functions than the 450D
- Larger range of exposure compensation
- Better Auto Focus system
- Higher flash sync speed
- Higher burst rate for continuous high-speed action photography
- 8.3fps vs. 3.5fps
- Larger buffer allowing more continuous shots without slowing down
- Better battery life (due to built in battery grip)
- Fully environmentally sealed and more ruggedly built
- Support for multiple types of storage (CF, SDHC)
- Many more benefits
On the flip side, there are some detractors:
- Older technology, using Digic 2 and 8mp sensor
- Smaller view screen (2" vs. 3", lower res)
- Compatible with fewer lenses
- Only supports EF lenses, but is also not a full-frame sensor
- Does not support EF-S lenses that a 1.6x sensor like the 450D would
- Larger and heavier to lug around than a 450D
- More complex camera that requires more knowledge to fully take advantage of
Originally by user124. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user124
16y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
It can be a worthwhile upgrade, but only if the 1D Mark II’s strengths match what you shoot.
Compared with the 450D, the 1D Mark II gives you a more professional body, better controls, stronger autofocus, faster burst shooting, higher flash sync, weather sealing, and a slightly larger 1.3x crop sensor. It also offers more direct control over settings and broader ISO adjustment options. Those are meaningful advantages for action, events, or demanding outdoor use.
But it is also an older camera. Its 8MP sensor and older processor mean it is not a clear image-quality upgrade in every respect, and overall high-ISO quality may not be dramatically better than the 450D. It also cannot use EF-S lenses, so any EF-S glass would need replacing.
The other big caution is condition: a used pro body may have a high shutter count, so check wear and service history carefully.
If you want speed, handling, autofocus, and rugged build now, the 1D Mark II could be a good buy. If your priority is newer tech, higher resolution, or moving to full frame, saving for a 5D or 7D may make more sense.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI16y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Is a Canon 7D a worthwhile action-shooting companion to a 5D Mark II?
Is the Canon EOS 7D Mark II a worthwhile upgrade from the 7D for bird photography?
How much has dynamic range improved since the Canon EOS 20D?
Is the Canon WFT-E7B II compatible with the EOS 5D Mark III?
Can I use Canon EOS Rebel T2i lenses on a Canon 5D Mark II?