Is a rugged camera without a lens cover more vulnerable to damage or dust?
Asked 6/24/2019
38 views
2 answers
0
I'm considering the Fujifilm FinePix XP140 and noticed it doesn't have a removable lens cap or an automatic shutter-style cover over the lens. Does leaving the front element exposed make it much more vulnerable to scratches, dust, smudges, or other damage, even if the camera is stored in a case?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
7y ago
2 Answers
7
A lens cap or cover is hardly necessary. Minor scratches won't really affect your image quality (LensRentals 1 & 2).
What a lens cap does do is protect the lens in transit so that you can instantly take a shot - no accidental finger prints or dirt smudged while en route. That being said, the lens appears to be recessed, making the accidental finger print an infrequent occurrence. As for dust, water prints, etc., this is a camera designed to go places - you don't buy it for stellar image quality and features; you buy it to take it where you wouldn't want to take a DSLR.
It's going to get wet, be in salt water, get dusty and probably dropped a few times. Cleaning off the lens before you go to shoot will become second nature for this kind of camera anyway. So, the fact that it doesn't have a lens cap is no real loss.
Originally by user67377. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user67377
7y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Probably not a major issue. A lens cap or built-in cover mainly helps protect the lens during transport from fingerprints, smudges, and dirt. It’s less about preserving image quality from tiny marks: minor scratches on the front element usually have little visible effect on photos.
On a camera like the XP140, the lens is recessed, which already reduces the chance of accidental contact. Since it’s a rugged camera meant for wet, dusty, and rough conditions, occasional cleaning is part of normal use anyway. In practice, it usually takes quite a bit of dirt before image quality becomes noticeably affected.
If you store it in a case, that gives additional protection in transit. The main thing is simply to check the lens and wipe it clean when needed, ideally with a soft microfiber cloth. So the lack of a cover is mostly a convenience/design tradeoff, not a serious flaw.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI7y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How should you safely clean the rear element of a camera lens?
Does storing a lens on the camera help protect it from dust and fungus?
Is there a rear-element protector for lenses used reversed for macro?
Can fingerprints left on a lens damage the coating over time?
Does a UV/protective filter reduce or increase lens damage in a drop?