Can free-lensing for macro damage your lens or camera?
Asked 12/17/2016
47 views
2 answers
0
I’ve been experimenting with macro photography by holding a lens backward against the camera mount (“free-lensing”), without a reversing ring. Is this likely to damage the lens or camera? What are the main risks or things I should watch out for when using this technique?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
9y ago
2 Answers
11
Whenever you're freelensing (holding the lens against the camera, rather than securing mounting it), you do run the danger of getting stuff inside the camera body (including stray light), but as long as you watched out to make sure nothing comes in contact with the lens elements, you probably aren't damaging your lens. The main "issues" (or features, depending on your POV) with freelensing are the fact that you can introduce light leaks and that you can inadvertently shift or tilt the lens [see the Wikipedia view camera article section on movements]. Most folks, in fact, use freelensing because of these two things.
If you want to avoid them, however, I'd recommend looking into get a reverse mount ring (which has the bayonet mount on one side, and filter rings on the other) or a rig of some kind, which eliminates the gap between the body and the lens, and if it offers electronic communication may allow you control over the lens aperture and/or autofocus. Focusing is still primarily going to be done by adjusting camera distance from the subject, as with any of the so-called "poor man's macro" methods.
You can also reverse mount a lens onto the face of a mounted lens, using a simple male-to-male filter "coupling ring" (probably the cheapest method gear-wise).
The other methods include macro-converters (aka close-up filters) and extension-tubes.
Originally by user27440. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user27440
9y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Free-lensing is not inherently harmful, but it does increase risk compared with mounting a lens normally.
Main concerns:
- dust, moisture, or debris can enter the camera body or lens more easily
- stray light can leak in and affect images
- the exposed lens end can be scratched or bumped
- on some cameras, the lens can rub against the mount area if you’re not careful
- some lenses can open internally during zoom/focus, making it easier for dust to get inside
If nothing touches the glass and you avoid dusty or wet environments, you’re unlikely to damage the lens just by holding it backward.
Free-lensing is also often used specifically because the loose fit allows light leaks and tilt/shift-like effects, so those are normal side effects of the technique.
If you want a safer, more controlled setup, use a reversing ring or consider extension tubes for macro work.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI9y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can you reverse-mount a lens from another camera system for macro work?
Why does my Canon 18-55mm lens look gray and blurry when used reversed?
Budget alternatives to a dedicated macro lens
Can reverse-mounting a lens on its filter thread damage it, and how heavy a lens is safe?
Why does a reversed lens show F00 and not focus normally on my Canon 7D?