Are used lenses that were mainly used for video a bad buy?
Asked 9/5/2018
2 views
2 answers
0
I’m considering a used Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM. The seller says it was used mostly for low-light video on a DSLR. Another photographer told me to avoid lenses that have been used for video, but didn’t explain why.
Is there any real reason to be more cautious with a lens that was used for videography rather than still photography? I can imagine autofocus, aperture, or zoom/focus mechanisms being used for longer continuous periods during video, but I’m not sure whether that creates meaningful extra wear in practice. Should I treat this as a red flag, or just evaluate the lens normally based on condition and function?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
7y ago
2 Answers
3
Am I missing something?
No. I don't think there's any good reason not to buy a lens which has been used for videography. My best guess would be that the person who told you this has misinterpreted something they've been told.
Originally by user11371. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user11371
7y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
In general, no: a lens used for video is not automatically a bad buy.
A lens itself isn’t harmed just because it was exposed to light for long periods. The main theoretical concern is wear on moving parts: autofocus, aperture, zoom, or focus mechanisms may be operated more continuously during video than during still shooting. If a particular lens design has weak mechanics or motors, heavy video use could add wear.
That said, the answers don’t suggest any broad rule that “video-used lenses” should be avoided. This sounds more like a misunderstanding or an overgeneralization than solid advice.
So don’t treat video use alone as a red flag. Instead, inspect the lens normally: check autofocus/manual focus operation, aperture behavior, zoom/focus smoothness, image quality, and overall physical condition. If the lens works properly and shows no signs of abuse, previous video use by itself is not a reason to reject it.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI7y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What should I check when buying a used DSLR body like a Nikon D610?
What should I check when buying a used tilt-shift lens?
Did Canon update later production of the EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6, or are older copies the same?
Can you tell from this listing photo if a twin-lens reflex camera has lens haze?
How can I identify image noise, and is there software that highlights noisy areas?