Are there robust invisible watermarks for still images, and how do they work?
Asked 2/17/2020
171 views
2 answers
0
I’m asking about invisible watermarking for still photographs similar to video watermarking systems that can survive transcoding, resizing, or some editing without visible artifacts. Do such systems exist for still images, and in general how do they work?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
6y ago
2 Answers
6
There are photoshop plugins around like imatag or digimarc, which offer this as a professional service.
The software encrypts a bit of information in a bit pattern and then hides this pattern in your image numerous times. This will work ok as long as there is enough variation in the image, which usually is true for photographies. The information is somewhat resilient against manipulation like cropping and re-encoding, but there are limits to that.
The question is, what you want to achieve: A watermark, visible or not, does not prevent copyright infringement. If you want to prove that you have the rights as a photographer, possession of the raw files is usually enough to do that. You could also create a digital signature on a file to prove that you were in possession of that file at a certain time.
The only thing, that you can do with that, is tracking which recipient of an image leaked the image (if you personalize the tag you insert per recipient).
Fun fact
If you own a laser printer and you print a single character on it you will find a dot pattern in yellow on the page if you use a magnification device. The dot code will contain enough information to identify your very printer.
Originally by user88965. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user88965
6y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes. Invisible digital watermarking exists for still images and is used commercially by services and plugins such as Digimarc or Imatag.
In general, these systems encode a small amount of information into a subtle pattern spread throughout the image many times. If the photo has enough natural variation, the embedded pattern can be hard to see while remaining detectable later. Because the data is repeated and distributed, it can often survive moderate resizing, recompression, and some cropping or editing—but only up to a point.
It’s important to separate goals:
- Invisible watermarking can help with tracing or identification.
- It does not prevent copying or infringement.
- If your goal is proving authorship, keeping the original RAW files is usually stronger evidence.
- A digital signature can prove that a specific file existed in your possession at a certain time, but that is different from a watermark embedded in image pixels.
So: yes, the technology exists for stills, but it is best viewed as a tracking/forensic tool rather than true copy protection.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI6y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can I create and apply a watermark to my photos?
How can I mark scanned photos to show authorship and survive light editing?
How are visible watermarks typically used on photos?
How do I choose the best image resampling algorithm for photos or graphics?
How can I shoot and edit product photos so the background is clean white or transparent?